Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Evidence and Resources
With the vast array of health information available both online and offline, distinguishing between evidence-based sources and unreliable ones presents a significant challenge (Abad et al., 2021). It’s crucial to rely on credible and authoritative sources for informed health management decisions. The importance of using evidence-based practices (EBP) to manage chronic conditions like diabetes was emphasized in a prior assessment. Diabetes, a chronic condition characterized by the body’s inability to efficiently use or produce insulin, necessitates reliable evidence-based resources for effective care (Mayo Clinic, 2023). This assessment will present a strategy for nurses to appraise and determine the trustworthiness of EBP resources.
The Necessity of an EBP Approach for Diabetes Management
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported over 37.3 million Americans with diabetes and an additional 96 million adults with prediabetes in 2020 (CDC, 2022). Complications from diabetes, such as stroke, heart disease, and kidney failure, mark it as a leading cause of mortality in the U.S. (Li et al., 2019). The economic burden of diabetes in the U.S. is substantial, with $327 billion annually allocated to diabetes care (CDC, 2023). Trustworthy EBP resources offer current and accurate information, enabling nurses to make informed treatment choices, thereby enhancing patient health outcomes and quality of life.
Rationale for Applying EBP in Diabetes Care
The accuracy and reliability of information are paramount for managing chronic conditions, where misinformation can lead to suboptimal care (Calero et al., 2019). EBP integrates clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence into clinical decision-making. Applying EBP in diabetes care involves using the best evidence to guide treatment choices, considering patient preferences and needs (Pranata et al., 2021). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) underscores the importance of an evidence-based approach for selecting effective interventions. Such interventions are critical for addressing the complexities of diabetes and aligning with patient values (ADA, 2022).
Trustworthiness and Relevance in Diabetes Management
Assessing the credibility and relevance of evidence in diabetes care is essential for delivering optimal patient care. Evaluating factors such as author credentials, the accuracy of the information, and its applicability to current practices is vital. Resources like the ADA’s Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes and the CDC’s diabetes management guidelines are based on the latest research, offering evidence-based recommendations (American Diabetes Association, 2022; CDC, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles also serve as dependable sources of information, as demonstrated by studies published in reputable journals (Campione et al., 2022).
Most Reliable EBP Resources
Trusted sources like CDC, PubMed, and ADA are invaluable for enhancing diabetes patient care. Nurses can rely on these resources for the latest EBP research.
Incorporating EBP Models for Improved Patient Outcomes
EBP models for diabetes involve integrating the best evidence into patient care, including research findings, clinical guidelines, and consensus statements. The Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Model is an example that facilitates the adoption of EBP by nurses, involving knowledge creation and an action cycle for implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions (Torres et al., 2023).
Conclusion: The Use of Credible EBP in Chronic Disease Management
Incorporation of EBP Model for Better Patient Outcomes
EBP models for diabetes involve using the best available evidence to inform decision-making and treatment planning for the patients. This includes incorporating research findings, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus statements into clinical practice (Bowles et al., 2021). By using EBP models, healthcare professionals can provide more standardized and consistent care, reducing the risk of errors or ineffective treatments.
The Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Model is a framework that guides the implementation of evidence-based practice by nurses and healthcare professionals (Torres et al., 2023). It consists of two main phases: knowledge creation and the action cycle.
- The first phase of knowledge creation involves identifying the problem or issue and systematically reviewing the literature. This is followed by synthesizing the evidence to determine the best course of action (Baloyi, 2022).
- The action cycle phase involves adapting the evidence to the local context, assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation, and selecting and tailoring the interventions. Ultimately, this phase ensures implementing, monitoring, and evaluating the implementation and sustaining the change over time (Torres et al., 2023).
Effectiveness in Managing Diabetes
In the context of diabetes, the KTA model would involve identifying the problem or issue related to diabetes care, such as a lack of adherence to medication regimens or inadequate monitoring of blood sugar levels. The knowledge creation phase reviews the available evidence to determine the most effective interventions for addressing the identified issue (Lee & Ho, 2019). The action cycle phase involves adapting the evidence to the local context by considering the resources and infrastructure available for diabetes care in a specific healthcare setting. Interventions may include patient education programs, medication management strategies, or improving communication and coordination among healthcare providers. The implementation and evaluation of these interventions will be monitored to ensure that they are effective and sustainable over time (Lee & Ho, 2019). They also ensure that the interventions are appropriate and feasible and address patients’ and nurses’ specific needs and challenges (Peters et al., 2020).
Conclusion NURS FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining Credibility of Evidence and Resources
There are numerous benefits of using credible evidence-based practice (EBP) resources in chronic disease management. Credible EBP resources can help patients and nurses stay informed about emerging research and treatment options allowing for more timely and effective interventions. In diabetes management, the approach can lead to better patient outcomes, improved quality of life, and reduced healthcare costs. Incorporating EBP models to address diabetes is critical for providing high-quality care. The KTA model provides a framework for implementing EBP models to help nurses identify the most effective interventions for diabetes care.
References
Abad, N., Ahmed, N., Amponsa-Achiano, K., Azlan, A., Arcos, R., Ayodele, J., Bechmann, A., Bayer, J., Broniatowski, D., Brooks, I., Bucci, L., Calleja, N., Carmi, E., Centola, D., Chandrasiri, O., Cui, Y., Dommett, K., Donovan, J., Dube, E., & Dunn, A. (2021, February 3). WHO public health research agenda for managing infodemics . Openaccess.city.ac.uk. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/30055/
ADA. (2022). American Diabetes Association releases 2023 standards of care in diabetes to guide prevention, diagnosis, and treatment for people living with diabetes | ADA . Diabetes.org. https://diabetes.org/newsroom/press-releases/2022/american-diabetes- association-2023-standards-care-diabetes-guide-for-prevention-diagnosis-treatment-people-living-with-diabetes
American Diabetes Association. (2022). Practice guidelines resources | American Diabetes Association . Diabetes.org. https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/practice-guidelines-resources
Baloyi, W. T. (2022). Assisting nurses with evidence-based practice: A case for the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Health SA Gesondheid , 27 . https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v27i0.2118
Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (2019). Assessing the Fidelity of evidence-based practices: History and current status of a standardized measurement methodology. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(6), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00991-6
Bowles, W., Buck, J., Brinkman, B., Hixon, B., Guo, J., & Zehala, A. (2021). Academic‐clinical nursing partnership use an evidence‐based practice model. Journal of Clinical Nursing . https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15710
Calero, M. Á., Villafáfila Gomila, C. J., & Sastre Fullana, P. (2019). Advanced practice nurses and evidence-based practice. An opportunity for change. Enfermería Clínica (English Edition) , 29(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2018.12.005
Campione, J. R., Ritchie, N. D., Fishbein, H. A., Mardon, R. E., Johnson, M. C., Pace, W., Birch, R. J., Seeholzer, E. L., Zhang, X., Proia, K., Siegel, K. R., & McKeever Bullard, K. (2022). Use and impact of type 2 diabetes prevention interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.002
CDC. (2019, November 21). CDC – Info quality support – Guidelines – FAQs – Science support – Science quality – OSQ – OS .cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/os/quality/support/info-qual.htm
CDC. (2022, July 7). What is diabetes? Cdc.gov https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/diabetes.html
CDC. (2022, June 29). National diabetes statistics report . Cdc.gov https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html
CDC. (2023, January 27). Health and economic benefits of diabetes interventions | Power of prevention . cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/programs-impact/pop/diabetes.htm#:~:text=total%20annual%20cost%20of%20diabetes5&text=%241%20out%20of%20every%20%244
Cochrane Library. (2019). About Cochrane reviews | Cochrane Library . Cochranelibrary.com. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-reviews
Dedeoglu, B. B. (2019). Are information quality and source credibility really important for shared content on social media? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management , 31(1), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2017-0691
Eberle, C., & Stichling, S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glycemic control in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome , 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-021-00705-9
Jackson, D., Power, T., & Walthall, H. (2023). Navigating the maze of research: Enhancing nursing and midwifery practice. In Google Books. Elsevier Health Sciences. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TbSvEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=credible+evidence+based+resources+for+nursing&ots=E0Wh6zuvhX&sig=AIjOjoxvFReezVsWt2KTaFDMVe0
Kilbourne, A. M., Glasgow, R. E., & Chambers, D. A. (2020). What can implementation science do for you? key success stories from the field. Journal of General Internal Medicine , 35(2), 783–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06174-6
Lam, C. K., & Schubert, C. (2019). Evidence‐based practice competence in nursing students: An exploratory study with important implications for educators. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 16 (2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12357
Lee, C., & Ho, K. (2019). Knowledge to action framework for home health monitoring. Healthcare Management Forum , 32(4), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419855364
Li, S., Wang, J., Zhang, B., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Diabetes mellitus and cause-specific mortality: A population-based study. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal , 43(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0060
Mayo Clinic. (2023, January 20). Diabetes – symptoms and causes . Mayoclinic.org https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/diabetes/symptoms-causes/syc-20371444
Muis, K. R., Denton, C., & Dubé, A. (2022). Identifying CRAAP on the internet: A source evaluation intervention. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal , 9(7), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.97.12670
Peters, S., Bussières, A., Depreitere, B., Vanholle, S., Cristens, J., Vermandere, M., & Thomas, A. (2020). Facilitating guideline implementation in primary health care practices. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health , 11 . https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720916263
Pranata, S., Wu, S.-F. V., Alizargar, J., Liu, J.-H., Liang, S.-Y., & Lu, Y.-Y. (2021). Precision health care elements, definitions, and strategies for patients with diabetes: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 18(12), 6535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126535
Sye, D., & Thompson, D. (2023). Tools, tests, and checklists: The evolution and future of source evaluation frameworks. Journal of New Librarianship , 8(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.33011/newlibs/13/9
Torres, C. P., Mendes, F. J., & Barbieri-Figueiredo, M. (2023). Use of “The Knowledge-to-Action Framework” for implementing evidence-based nursing in child and family care: Study protocol. PLOS ONE , 18(3), 0283656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283656
Vamanu, I., & Zak, E. (2022). Information source and content: Articulating two key concepts for information evaluation. Information and Learning Sciences , 123(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-09-2021-0084
Warkentin, J. (2019). Chapter 7: Credible research sources. Ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/comm/chapter/chapter-7-sources-choosing-the-right-ones-writing-for-success-1st-canadian-edition/
Williamson, P., & Minter, C. I. J. (2019). Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services. Journal of the Medical Library Association , 107(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.433